| YELLOWSTONE
NATIONAL PARK, Wyo. - It's just after lunchtime,
but it's already been a long day. Blood samples were
taken earlier from several dozen restless bison herded
into a capture pen on the north end of the park. Now,
the samples have been tested and it's time to find out
who stays, who dies and who gets a shot of vaccine.
Rick Wallen, a Yellowstone wildlife biologist, emerged
from a trailer with a clipboard and climbed onto the
grated walkways overlooking the holding pens and chutes.
As two bison moved into the chute below, a crew member
called out the four-digit number on the sticker affixed
to the bison's hides. Wallen checked his clipboard and
found both tested positive for exposure to brucellosis.
"Ship," he said. The news was relayed by hand
signals - an unmistakable thumbs down - and the bison
were herded toward a pen where they would be sent to
slaughter the next morning. Next up was a yearling bison
skittering wide-eyed through the chute. "Keep,"
Wallen announced after checking his notes. The bison,
soon clamped into a narrow passageway, was the first
that day to get a syringe full of RB51, a vaccine designed
to protect animals from brucellosis. Throughout the
afternoon, bison were sorted, some were vaccinated and
about half that tested negative were slated for slaughter.
At times the capture facility, where several of the
animals had red gouges from tussles with their pen-mates,
seemed more like a domestic cattle operation than a
place for Yellowstone's iconic wild bison. The Stephens
Creek bison pen, tucked behind a locked gate and down
a gravel road, has been a busy place the last two months.
So far this year, 464 of Yellowstone's estimated 4,200
bison have been captured. Of those, 264 have been taken
to slaughter and 198 are being held until food conditions
improve in Yellowstone. The activity - hazing and capturing
bison that might leave Yellowstone - is nothing new.
What's new is a push to vaccinate some of the bison
that are captured. State and federal officials believe
that the vaccinations can reduce the risk of transmitting
brucellosis from the park's bison to cattle outside
the boundaries. Yellowstone officials this year began
giving shots to bison calves and yearlings that had
already tested negative for exposure to brucellosis.
About 111 have received the vaccine so far. The vaccination
program is expected to continue next year on the north
end of the park. Also, Montana Department of Livestock
officials are preparing to conduct a study about whether
a similar program should be started for bison that leave
Yellowstone's western boundary. The effectiveness of
the vaccination on bison, though, is unclear. In one
controlled test, RB51 was able to help 60 percent of
vaccinated calves fend off brucella bacteria. Elsewhere,
though, the success rate isn't as good. "So far
there is no consensus on efficacy. Some indications
of protection have been found in some studies; others
have failed to find any protection," said a 2002
paper on RB51 bison vaccine written by two scientists
from the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Department
of Agriculture. Yellowstone officials in the mid-1960s
tried a version of the capture, test, slaughter and/or
vaccinate program but soon scrapped it. "These
efforts were reviewed by park management and determined
to be ineffective and 'never-ending,' " according
to background information in the current Interagency
Bison Management Plan. Wallen said RB51 is a better
option than a predecessor, known as Strain 19, but uncertainties
about RB51 remain. Park officials put ear tags on the
vaccinated bison this year and will test their exposure
to brucellosis if the bison are captured again. That's
the best plan so far, Wallen said, but technological
advances could improve the program. "There are
a lot of different things happening in the world of
vaccines, some very promising studies using DNA,"
Wallen said. The Department of Livestock also wants
to study how a vaccination program might work on the
west side of Yellowstone, where bison often wander out
during the winter. "The goal is to increase overall
herd immunity and try to prevent infection within the
herd," said Karen Cooper, a Department of Livestock
spokeswoman, adding that the state and federal plan
is aimed at protecting cattle from brucellosis while
maintaining a wild bison herd. But Ted Fellman with
the Buffalo Field Campaign, a group fighting against
the bison hazing and capturing program, said the vaccination
program is a short-sighted way to deal with a "problem
that doesn't exist." "By vaccinating them
and holding them in captivity and ear-tagging them -
it's turning the wildlife of Yellowstone into livestock,"
Fellman said. "It's appalling that the Park Service
would treat them that way."
--------------------------------------------
It probably was cattle that first spread brucellosis
to Yellowstone's
bison.
Cows came to the park with people who lived and worked
at
Yellowstone. At Buffalo Ranch in the Lamar Valley, bison
probably
came in contact with infectious aborted material left
behind by
cattle, according to Mary Meagher, a former Park Service
scientist
who researched the origins of the disease in Yellowstone.
Brucellosis was first diagnosed in the Yellowstone bison
in 1917.
"It pretty well comes back to the Buffalo Ranch,"
said Meagher, who
retired in 1997.
Over the years, the bison population fluctuated but
concerns over
brucellosis remained. Nearby ranchers were especially
worried that
the contagious disease, which can cause abortions and
other problems,
would infect cattle herds outside Yellowstone.
In Montana, livestock officials remain concerned that
the bison could
cause the loss of the state's brucellosis-free status,
which would
mean increased measures and costs for shipping cattle
across state
lines.
A plan approved in 2000 by Montana and federal agencies,
including
the Park Service, allows bison that leave the park -
or, on the north
end, appear to be headed for the border - to be hazed,
captured,
tested and sometimes sent to slaughter.
Last year, 231 were killed after being captured on Yellowstone's
northern end. More than 1,000 were sent to slaughter
in the winter of
1996-97.
Earlier this winter, park officials estimated there
were a record
4,200 bison in Yellowstone. But in mid-February, the
fluffy snow on
the park's northern range became packed and hard. That
makes it more
difficult for bison to get to the food below, so they
migrate north
in search of lower elevations and more to eat.
Over the course of several weeks, hundreds of bison
were taken to the
Stephens Creek facility. About half tested negative
for exposure to
brucellosis and will be held in a pasture until later
this spring.
While much of the focus is on the bison captured on
the northern end,
Wallen said it's easy to forget about the other thousands
of bison in
Yellowstone's interior.
"Even though we handled some 460 animals, there
are still over 3,500
that we haven't touched on the landscape. That's twice
what was there
20 years ago," Wallen said.
Eventually, the vaccination program could lead to a
more hands-off
approach to bison - or at least an expansion of their
range, Wallen
said.
"We're trying to develop a program so that the
(Montana) state
veterinarian has a greater confidence that there'll
be no exposure
risk to livestock he's charged to protect," Wallen
said.
For now, though, the vaccinated animals aren't given
a free pass to
wander outside Yellowstone and the prospect of claiming
that there's
no risk of bison transmitting the disease to cattle
is slim.
"It's not zero right now," Wallen said. "It
may never be zero."
--------------------------------------
By the numbers:
The winter of 2003-04 has been a busy one for crews
trying to keep
bison from leaving the northern end of Yellowstone National
Park. A
look at the numbers so far this year:
464 captured at the Stephens Creek pen and pasture
264 sent to slaughter
198 being held for release later this spring
1 bison died in captivity
1 bull bison shot
111 or 113 calves and yearlings vaccinated
4,200 estimated in Yellowstone at the beginning of the
winter
Top
of Page |