Chronicle
Opinion: Bison plan is failing on many fronts
Bozeman Daily Chronicle
OUR OPINION
3/25/08
State and federal government officials called
a halt this week to the slaughter of at least some of
the bison that wander out of Yellowstone National
Park. But only after nearly a thousand of the shaggy beasts
were slaughtered in the name of disease control - even
though the animals killed were never tested for disease.
The events of this winter have made
one thing clear: The longawaited and much-touted Interagency
Bison Management Plan adopted in 2000 isn't working.
It's failing because the federal government has failed
to provide the funds needed to implement the plan. And
it's failing because it hasn't proven up to the challenge
of dealing with the park's fluctuating bison population.
The state of Montana, the National Park
Service, the Forest Service and the federal Animal Plant
Health Inspection Service developed the plan in the 1990s
following public outcry over the wholesale slaughter of
these wild animals - a species some consider to be emblematic
of the American West.
The plan called for the 30-year lease
of 7,500 acres of winter grazing land for the bison outside
the park to the tune of $2.8 million. It also provided
for a limited sport hunt that would provide for some population
control in a manner that was palatable to the public.
And it ensured that bison leaving the park would
not pose the risk of infection of domestic livestock of
brucellosis - a disease that causes cattle to abort and
that was eliminated in Montana some years ago at a significant
cost to the state's livestock industry.
Heavy snowfall this winter has exposed
all the weaknesses in this plan. Hunting provided for
the harvest of mere 166 animals, not nearly enough to
control a park bison population at the end of last
summer of some 4,700 animals - well in excess of the park's
carrying capacity. And the federal government has failed
to come up with its share of the money needed to lease
grazing land outside the park.
All the parties involved need to get
together and revisit this plan. Needed is more land outside
the park in which to conduct a more extensive hunt along
with more money to lease land to accommodate the hunt
and ensure bison do not come in contact with livestock.
Also needed is more of commitment from
the Park Service - the source of this problem. Conservation
groups have faulted the Animal Plant Health Inspection
Service for failing to come up with funds for the grazing
leases. But perhaps the Park Service should come up with
this money from its wildlife management funds.
This much is certain: The current bison management
plan is not adequate for dealing with park bison migration.
The agencies involved need to acknowledge that and go
back to the drawing board.